Oops, what pinchemente moderns are, alas! The City is the first Latin American city to approve gay marriage, oh, how gross, what achievements!
Right now when the union is the paradigm among young heterosexual, where marriage is seen as a thing of the past and many consider him a nice ballast assembly out our capital city to "bless" gay unions.
For what else is it but a "blessing" legal? Companies were already living together, very little relief by some (in the first year benefited less than 1000 people, or less than 500 pairs in a city of 20 million, 0.005% if I remember correctly) What can give added benefit? To adopt? I certainly hope not, especially when we see heterosexual couples, with many years of living together, buying little boys illegally because the law makes it impossible to take and when the homes for the women who abort rather than give their children for adoption, are in the painful task of denying eligibility because many couples without children!
I imagine the right to a beneficiary or heir of your partner will be as complicated as happens to many families, in which, without a will through, things can end up in a black dinner (even with the marriage certificate and other papers in hand) .
"is that we all have the same rights," yeah, sure!. Everyone has the right to marry a woman (and only one at a time) and woman to marry a man. If some people and some do not like candidates with whom they can marry that's your problem!
is like wanting to make a contract of sale but want to call loan, because I like the title, is the prettiest. If there is an exchange of goods or services for money is called sale. Point. The names refer to reality. Nobody forces you to carry out contracts of one kind or another if you want, and if the names do not like, we are sorry, but the fact is that in any dealership, for example you want to make a contract of sale without pay, or make a loan for putting your money at stake. Some will hit.
Everyone can make his life a kite, very clear to me, but to me, that's saying a porous crust , inaccuracy and / or ambiguity in the legal aspects, has always bothered me ... a lot.
Right now when the union is the paradigm among young heterosexual, where marriage is seen as a thing of the past and many consider him a nice ballast assembly out our capital city to "bless" gay unions.
For what else is it but a "blessing" legal? Companies were already living together, very little relief by some (in the first year benefited less than 1000 people, or less than 500 pairs in a city of 20 million, 0.005% if I remember correctly) What can give added benefit? To adopt? I certainly hope not, especially when we see heterosexual couples, with many years of living together, buying little boys illegally because the law makes it impossible to take and when the homes for the women who abort rather than give their children for adoption, are in the painful task of denying eligibility because many couples without children!
I imagine the right to a beneficiary or heir of your partner will be as complicated as happens to many families, in which, without a will through, things can end up in a black dinner (even with the marriage certificate and other papers in hand) .
"is that we all have the same rights," yeah, sure!. Everyone has the right to marry a woman (and only one at a time) and woman to marry a man. If some people and some do not like candidates with whom they can marry that's your problem!
is like wanting to make a contract of sale but want to call loan, because I like the title, is the prettiest. If there is an exchange of goods or services for money is called sale. Point. The names refer to reality. Nobody forces you to carry out contracts of one kind or another if you want, and if the names do not like, we are sorry, but the fact is that in any dealership, for example you want to make a contract of sale without pay, or make a loan for putting your money at stake. Some will hit.
Everyone can make his life a kite, very clear to me, but to me, that's saying a porous crust , inaccuracy and / or ambiguity in the legal aspects, has always bothered me ... a lot.